Comparison of Speedometer Test Results between Static and Dynamic Methods in Two-Wheeled Motorcycle Type Approval

Authors

  • I Made Cahyana Wiryanata Program Studi Teknologi Otomotif, Politeknik Transportasi Darat Bali, Tabanan, Indonesia Author
  • Aris Budi Sulistyo Program Studi Teknologi Otomotif, Politeknik Transportasi Darat Bali, Tabanan, Indonesia Author
  • I Gusti Bagus Eka Nitiyasa Program Studi Teknologi Otomotif, Politeknik Transportasi Darat Bali, Tabanan, Indonesia Author
  • I Wayan Yogi Arta Teknik Listrik Bandara, Politeknik Penerbangan Jayapura, Jayapura, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70716/reswara.v4i4.795

Keywords:

GPS/GLONASS antenna, speedometer tester, static and dynamic methods, statistical significance, vehicle type approval

Abstract

Vehicle speedometer testing is an important component of vehicle type approval to ensure that the indicated speed is evaluated using standardized testing procedures. At the Indonesian Vehicle Testing and Certification Center (BPLJSKB), speedometer testing can be conducted using a static method with a speedometer tester or a dynamic method based on a GPS/GLONASS antenna. The different measurement environments and principles may produce variations in the resulting speedometer values. This study aimed to compare speedometer test results obtained using static and dynamic methods for a two-wheeled motorcycle under controlled testing conditions. A quantitative comparative method with an experimental approach was employed. Each testing method was repeated 25 times at reference speeds of 40 km/h and 80 km/h, resulting in 100 observations. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, normality and homogeneity tests, an Independent Samples t-test, and Cohen’s d effect size analysis. The results showed no statistically significant difference between the static and dynamic methods, with p-values of 0.15 at 40 km/h and 0.10 at 80 km/h. The mean differences were 0.13 km/h and −0.17 km/h, respectively, while the absolute Cohen’s d values were 0.41 and 0.47. These findings indicate statistically comparable results under the experimental conditions, although they do not establish full interchangeability between the two methods.

References

Ahadi, G. D., & Zain, N. N. L. E. (2023). The simulation study of normality test using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Anderson-Darling, and Shapiro-Wilk. Eigen Mathematics Journal, 6(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.29303/emj.v6i1.131

Aida, A., Hermina, D., & Norlaila, N. (2025). Jenis data penelitian kuantitatif (korelasional, komparatif, dan eksperimen). Al-Manba: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan, 10(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.69782/almanba.v10i1.48

Al Fatih, F., Lubis, N. P., HSB, K. N., Zulpan, Z., & Arianto, A. (2026). Konsep homogenitas dan normalitas dalam statistik serta teknik pengujiannya. Educational Journal, 1(3), 805–817. https://doi.org/10.63822/b98bqe88

Dong, J., & Hua, Q. (2022). Overview and progress of GNSS anti-multipath antenna designs. Sensors and Machine Learning Applications, 2(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.55627/smla.002.03.00026

Firdaus, D. H. (2023). Pengaruh tekanan angin ban kendaraan Mitsubishi L300 terhadap hasil uji speedometer tester [Laporan/Tugas akhir]. Politeknik Keselamatan Transportasi Jalan.

Harahap, Y. A., Nasution, R. P., & Amir, A. (2025). Peran ukuran pemusatan dan penyebaran data dalam analisis statistika. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.38955

Hasanah, N. U., & Albina, M. (2025). Hakikat desain eksperimental: Pendekatan konseptual dan implikasinya dalam penelitian kuantitatif. QAZI: Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(1), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.61104/qz.v2i1.276

Indonesia. (2012). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 55 Tahun 2012 tentang kendaraan.

Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia Nomor PM 33 Tahun 2018 tentang pengujian tipe kendaraan bermotor.

Isnaini, M., Afgani, M. W., Haqqi, A., & Azhari, I. (2025). Teknik analisis data uji normalitas. J-CEKI: Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 4(2), 1377–1384. https://doi.org/10.56799/jceki.v4i2.7007

Krzan, G., Dawidowicz, K., & Paziewski, J. (2024). Low-cost GNSS antennas in precise positioning: A focus on multipath and antenna phase center models. GPS Solutions, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-024-01645-3

Muslimin, I., Farid, M., & Mandra, M. A. S. (2024). Analisis kinerja battery charging menggunakan tenaga surya untuk kendaraan roda dua. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi Otomotif, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpvo.v7i1.73491

Noval, R., Sumarsono, D. A., Adhitya, M., Heryana, G., Zainuri, F., Tullah, M. H., & Todaro, M. (2025). Performance evaluation and accuracy analysis of a chassis dynamometer for light electric vehicles. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 16(3), Article 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16030170

Shim, J.-R., & Kim, B.-C. (2022). Comparison of measurement accuracies of GPS-type and noncontact optical-type speed sensors by vehicle test. Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Process Engineers, 21(10), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.14775/ksmpe.2022.21.10.022

Siroj, R. A., Afgani, W., Fatimah, Septaria, D., Zahira, G., & Salsabila. (2024). Metode penelitian kuantitatif pendekatan ilmiah untuk analisis data. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 7.

Steinmetz, E., Jarlemark, P. O. J., Emardson, R., Skoogh, H., & Herbertsson, M. (2014). Assessment of GPS derived speed for verification of speed measuring devices. International Journal of Instrumentation Technology, 1(3), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIT.2014.065160

Subhaktiyasa, P. G., Candrawati, S. A. K., Sumaryani, N. P., Sunita, N. W., & Syakur, A. (2025). Penerapan statistik deskriptif: Perspektif kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains, 14(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.59672/emasains.v14i1.4450

Supej, M., & Čuk, I. (2014). Comparison of Global Navigation Satellite System devices on speed tracking in road (tran)sport applications. Sensors, 14(12), 23490–23508. https://doi.org/10.3390/s141223490

Syafriani, D. (2021). Pembelajaran statistika dengan metode tutorial menggunakan aplikasi SPSS untuk meningkatkan kemampuan stastistik mahasiswa. JS (Jurnal Sekolah), 5(2), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.24114/js.v5i2.26302

United Nations. (2017). UN Regulation No. 39: Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the speedometer and odometer equipment including its installation. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.

Yulianti, R., Syukrilla, W. A., Effendi, Febriyanti, T. L., Rahayu, D. S., Agung, B. H., Oktarianto, M. L., Koto, S. K., Rahmawan, S., Asmara, A., Awaluddin, Sidabutar, Y. A., Krisma, D. A., Adi, N. R. M., & Zulaeha, O. (2024). Metode penelitian eksperimen: Konsep, implementasi, dan studi kasus. PT Mifandi Mandiri Digital.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-02

How to Cite

Wiryanata, I. M. C. ., Sulistyo, A. B. ., Nitiyasa, I. G. B. E. ., & Arta, I. W. Y. (2026). Comparison of Speedometer Test Results between Static and Dynamic Methods in Two-Wheeled Motorcycle Type Approval. RESWARA: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Teknik, 4(4), 1373-1387. https://doi.org/10.70716/reswara.v4i4.795