The Effect of EMA and CSR Costs on BOPO Mediated by GRI 11-Based CSR Disclosure: Pertamina Group 2020–2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70716/emis.v4i3.823Keywords:
environmental management accounting, CSR cost allocation, GRI 11 disclosure, BOPO efficiencyAbstract
This study investigates the impact of Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) and CSR Cost Allocation on BOPO Efficiency, with GRI 11 Disclosure acting as a mediating variable, at the Pertamina Group during the 2020–2025 period. The analysis method employed is Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). The findings from the empirical investigation indicate that the integration of EMA and CSR Cost Allocation is accountable for 63.8% of the variation in GRI 11 Disclosure, as indicated by R² = 0.638. This integration exhibited positive and statistically significant direct effects, β = 0.521 (p = 0.000) and β = 0.348 (p = 0.000), respectively. . In contrast, the direct impact of CSR Cost Allocation on the BOPO ratio was found to be relatively robust (β = -0.214, p = 0.023). The findings of the mediation test demonstrated that GRI 11 Disclosure functions as a complete mediator in the association between EMA and BOPO, with an indirect effect coefficient of β = -0.303 (p = 0.000). Meanwhile, in the relationship between CSR Cost Allocation and BOPO, GRI 11 Disclosure acts as a partial mediator, with an indirect effect coefficient of β = -0.202 (p = 0.000). These findings serve to reinforce the theoretical integration between the Resource-Based View and Legitimation Theory, affirming that transparency in sector-based reporting has the capacity to transform internal capabilities and social expenditures into key drivers of long-term operational efficiency.
References
Adams, C. A., Alhamood, A., He, X., Tian, J., Wang, L., & Wang, Y. (2022). The nature of materiality in sustainability reporting and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards update. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(4), 1141–1168. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2021-5487
Aji, T., & Wahyudin, A. (2025). The mediating role of accountability in the relationship between green accounting and sustainable development. Econbank: Journal of Economics and Banking, 7(2), 149–163.
Amidjaya, P. G., & Widagdo, A. K. (2020). Sustainability reporting in Indonesian listed banks: Do corporate governance, ownership structure and digital banking matter? Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(2), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-09-2018-0149.
Aula, R., Sumiyati, S., & Mai, M. U. (2022). The effect of corporate social responsibility disclosure on the performance of Islamic banks in Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 13(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.18196/mb.v13i1.12832
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Burritt, R. L., & Christ, K. L. (2016). Industry 4.0 and environmental accounting: A new revolution? Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 1, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41180-016-0007-y.
Burritt, R. L., Hahn, T., & Schaltegger, S. (2002). Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental management accounting: Links between business actors and environmental management accounting tools. Australian Accounting Review, 12(27), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2002.tb00202.x
Cardoni, A., Kustono, A. S., & Tiron-Tudor, A. (2019). Sustainability reporting disclosure in the oil and gas industry: A comparative analysis of international practices. Sustainability, 11(4), Article 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041019
Degenhart, L., Zonatto, V. C. S., Rigon, L., & Monteiro, A. S. (2024). Effects of the environmental management system and top management support on the relationship between environmental management accounting practices and performance. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia. https://doi.org/10.5585/2024.25487
Dietz, S., Gardiner, D., Jahn, V., & Noels, J. (2021). How ambitious are oil and gas companies' climate targets? Science, 374(6566), 405–408. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abh0688
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003
Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial least squares: Konsep, teknik dan aplikasi menggunakan program SmartPLS 3.0 untuk penelitian empiris. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI 11: Oil and gas sector 2021. Global Sustainability Standards Board. https://www.globalreporting.org
Gunarathne, A. D. N., Lee, K.-H., & Hitigala Kaluarachchilage, P. K. (2021). Institutional pressures, environmental management strategy, and organizational performance: The role of environmental management accounting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 825–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2656
Gyane, A. T., Nunoo, E. K., Suleman, S., & Essandoh-Yeddu, J. (2021). Sustaining oil and gas multinational operations through corporate social responsibility practices. Discover Sustainability, 2(1), Article 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-021-00042-x
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Meckling, W. H., & Jensen, M. C. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305--360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Roemer, E. (2016). A tutorial on the use of PLS path modeling in longitudinal studies. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1901–1921. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0317
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571--610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
Sugiyono. (2023). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods. Alfabeta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Endang Kusmana, Wahidahwati (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




