From Work-Life Conflict to Innovative Behaviour: The Mediating Roles of Psychological Capital, Leader-Member Exchange, and Resistance to Change

Authors

  • Dimas Dwi Utama Doctoral Program in Management Science, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Zulfakhri Doctoral Program in Management Science, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Indah Nikensari Doctoral Program in Management Science, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0413-655X
  • Tuty Sariwulan Doctoral Program in Management Science, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8251-4460
  • Corry Yohana Doctoral Program in Management Science, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9249-6880

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70716/emis.v4i2.610

Keywords:

Work Life Conflict, Innovative Behaviour, Psychological Capital, Leader Member Exchange, Resistance To Chang

Abstract

This study examines how work life conflict affects innovative behaviour through psychological capital, leader member exchange, and resistance to change among telecommuting employees in an Indonesian general insurance company. The study responds to the growing relevance of flexible work, digital collaboration, and employee innovation in contemporary organisations. A quantitative explanatory design was employed using survey data from 211 permanent employees. The data were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling with SmartPLS. The results show that work life conflict negatively affects psychological capital, leader member exchange, and innovative behaviour, while positively affecting resistance to change. Psychological capital positively affects innovative behaviour and leader member exchange, while reducing resistance to change. Leader member exchange positively affects innovative behaviour and negatively affects resistance to change. Resistance to change negatively affects innovative behaviour. The mediation results confirm that psychological capital, leader member exchange, and resistance to change mediate the relationship between work life conflict and innovative behaviour. In addition, psychological capital and leader member exchange serially mediate this relationship. These findings indicate that employee innovation in telecommuting contexts is shaped by interconnected psychological, relational, and change related mechanisms. The study contributes to human resource management by highlighting the importance of reducing work life conflict, strengthening psychological capital, improving supervisor employee relationships, and managing resistance to change to sustain innovative behaviour.

References

Abstein, A., Heidenreich, S., & Spieth, P. (2014). Innovative work behaviour: The impact of comprehensive HR system perceptions and the role of work life conflict. Industry and Innovation, 21(2), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2014.896159

Ahdiat, A. (2024, September 24). Produktivitas tenaga kerja RI urutan ke 5 di Asia Tenggara. Databoks.

Aleksić, D., Mihelič, K. K., Černe, M., & Škerlavaj, M. (2017). Interactive effects of perceived time pressure, satisfaction with work-family balance (SWFB), and leader-member exchange (LMX) on creativity. Personnel Review. 46(3), 662-679. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2015-0085

Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273

Alshebami, A. S. (2021). The influence of psychological capital on employees' innovative behavior: Mediating role of employees' innovative intention and employees' job satisfaction. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040809

Amarantou, V., Kazakopoulou, S., Chatzoudes, D., & Chatzoglou, P. (2018). Resistance to change: An empirical investigation of its antecedents. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(2), 426-450. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2017-0196

Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Luthans, F. (2008). Can positive employees help positive organisational change? Impact of psychological capital and emotions on relevant attitudes and behaviours. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886307311470

Bak, H., Jin, M. H., & McDonald, B. D. (2022). Unpacking the transformational leadership-innovative work behavior relationship: The mediating role of psychological capital. Public Performance and Management Review, 45(1), 80-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2021.1939737

Battistelli, A., Montani, F., & Odoardi, C. (2013). The impact of feedback from job and task autonomy in the relationship between dispositional resistance to change and innovative work behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(1), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2011.616653

Bayu, D. J. (2021, February 11). Most Indonesian workers are ready for long term remote work. Databoks.

Brunetto, Y., Kominis, G., & Ashton-Sayers, J. (2024). Authentic leadership, psychological capital, acceptance of change, and innovative work behaviour in non-profit organisations. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 83(1), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12603

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dar, N., Ahmad, S., Badar, K., & Kundi, Y. M. (2024). Unraveling the link between innovative work behavior and despotic leadership: The roles of supervisor conflict and dispositional resistance to change trait. International Journal of Conflict Management, 35(4), 816-834. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-09-2023-0180

Devassy, S., & Jindal, P. (2024). The impact of psychological capital, cognitive diversity and temporal ambidexterity on adaptive performance through innovative work behaviour among IT employees in India. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-04-2024-0196

Dimitrov, D. M. (2014). Statistical methods for validation of assessment scale data in counseling and related fields. John Wiley & Sons.

Dorling, J. L. (2017). Impact of psychological capital on the resistance to change during post-merger integration: A theoretical model. Journal of Organizational Change Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2015-0199

Farr, J. L., & Ford, C. M. (1990). Individual innovation. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organisational strategies (pp. 63–80). John Wiley & Sons.

Feng, X., & Adams, D. (2023). Can leaders enhance followers' psychological capital? A framework to support leader-member exchange for sustainable organizations. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(6-7), 1323-1334. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2022-0458

Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2009). Beyond work and family: A measure of work/nonwork interference and enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 441. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0016737

Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2009). Beyond work and family: A measure of work/nonwork interference and enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016737

Gallup. (2026). State of the global workplace: Indonesia country level data.

Gisler, S., Omansky, R., Alenick, P. R., Tumminia, A. M., Eatough, E. M., & Johnson, R. C. (2018). Work-life conflict and employee health: A review. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 23(4), e12157.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling using R: A workbook. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Huang, X., Liu, Y., & Zhao, J. (2024). The impacts of work-family conflict and corporate innovation on organizational performance. SAGE Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241247626

Ibrahim, M., Putra, T. R. I., & Suryani, I. (2024). Does social support and work-life conflict moderate the influence of job stress on job performance? Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(2), 463-476. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.36

Karimi, S., Ahmadi Malek, F., Yaghoubi Farani, A., & Liobikienė, G. (2023). The role of transformational leadership in developing innovative work behaviors: The mediating role of employees' psychological capital. Sustainability, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021267

Keeney, J., Boyd, E. M., Sinha, R., Westring, A. F., & Ryan, A. M. (2013). From "work-family" to "work-life": Broadening our conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(3), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.01.005

Keeney, J., Boyd, E. M., Sinha, R., Westring, A. F., & Ryan, A. M. (2013). From work family to work life: Broadening our conceptualisation and measurement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(3), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.01.005

Khattak, S. I., Khan, M. A., Ali, M. I., Khan, H. G. A., & Saeed, I. (2023). Relationship between servant leadership, leader-member exchange, organization learning and innovative work behavior: Evidence from high-tech firms. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231212267

Kim, B. P., Lee, G., & Carlson, K. D. (2010). An examination of the nature of the relationship between leader-member-exchange (LMX) and turnover intent at different organizational levels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(4), 591-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.10.025

Kim, B. P., Lee, G., & Carlson, K. D. (2010). An examination of the nature of the relationship between leader member exchange and turnover intent at different organisational levels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(4), 591–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.10.025

Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi dimensional measure of individual innovative behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005660

Kossek, E., & Lee, K. (2017). Work-family conflict and work-life conflict. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management.

Li, C., Ashraf, S. F., Amin, S., & Safdar, M. N. (2023). Consequence of resistance to change on AI readiness: Mediating-moderating role of task-oriented leadership and high-performance work system in the hospitality sector. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231217731

Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639802400105

Luthans, F., & Youssef Morgan, C. M. (2017). Psychological capital: An evidence based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 339–366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113324

Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. M. (2017). Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 339-366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113324

Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541-572.

Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x

Min, Y., Wenjing, Q., Jizu, L., Yong, Y., & Yanyu, G. (2023). Work-family conflict, work engagement and unsafe behavior among miners in China. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 29(4), 1376-1382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2022.2131128

Mishra, P., Bhatnagar, J., Gupta, R., & Wadsworth, S. M. (2019). How work-family enrichment influences innovative work behavior: Role of psychological capital and supervisory support. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(1), 58-80. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.23

Muhamad, N. (2024, December 31). Gaji jadi pertimbangan utama Gen Z dalam mencari kerja. Databoks.

Mulligan, R., Ramos, J., Martín, P., & Zornoza, A. (2021). Inspiriting innovation: The effects of leader-member exchange (LMX) on innovative behavior as mediated by mindfulness and work engagement. Sustainability, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105409

Mustafa, G., Mubarak, N., Khan, J., Nauman, M., & Riaz, A. (2023). Impact of leader-member exchange on innovative work behavior of information technology project employees: Role of employee engagement and self-efficacy. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 35(4), 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-022-09429-y

Nurcholidah, L., Haryono, T., Sunaryo, S., & Hendarsjah, H. (2023). Work family conflict, job stress and employee engagement on innovation work behavior: Mediating roles of career adaptability. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i5.1005

OJK. (2017). Asuransi. https://www.ojk.go.id/

Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 680.

Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.680

Oreg, S. (2018). Resistance to change and performance: Toward a more even handed view of dispositional resistance. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886317741867

Pahlevi, R. (2022, August 4). Survei: WFH lebih dianggap efektif oleh Gen Z. Databoks.

Palumbo, R. (2020). Let me go to the office! An investigation into the side effects of working from home on work-life balance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(6/7), 771-790. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2020-0150

Presbitero, A., & Aruta, J. J. B. R. (2024). Reducing employee burnout in the context of a global crisis and remote work: Focusing on quality of leader-member exchange, trust in leader and organizational identification. Asian Business and Management, 23(1), 32-54. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-023-00241-6

Pu, J., Hou, H., Ma, R., & Sang, J. (2017). The effect of psychological capital between work-family conflict and job burnout in Chinese university teachers: Testing for mediation and moderation. Journal of Health Psychology, 22(14), 1799-1807. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316636950

PwC Indonesia. (2026). Workforce hopes and fears survey 2025: Indonesia.

Ridwan, A. (2025, June 25). Microsoft reveals reasons why Indonesian workers will use AI in 2025. Databoks. 5

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2022). SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS GmbH.

Sampath, P., Baral, R., & Rastogi, M. (2020). Crossover of work-family conflict in supervisor-subordinate dyads in India: Does LMX matter? South Asian Journal of Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-11-2019-0212

Septiani, L. (2024, June 12). 92% pekerja Gen Z hingga Boomer di Indonesia sudah pakai AI. Katadata.co.id.

Sharif, S., Tongkachok, K., Akbar, M., Iqbal, K., & Lodhi, R. N. (2024). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior in three-star hotels: Mediating role of leader-member exchange, knowledge sharing and voice behavior. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 54(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-07-2021-0122

Shockley, K. M., & Singla, N. (2011). Reconsidering work-family interactions and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37(3), 861-886.

Smothers, J. (2024). Managing innovative talent: A moderated-mediation model of the relationship between leader-member exchange, learning strategies and innovation. Learning Organization, 31(4), 508-525. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-04-2023-0062

Subramani, A. K., Jan, N. A., Joseph, S., & David, R. (2024). Fostering innovative work behaviour in Indian IT firms: The mediating influence of employee psychological capital in the context of transformational leadership. International Journal of Work Innovation, 5(4), 384-402. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWI.2024.142024

Van Dam, K., Oreg, S., & Schyns, B. (2008). Daily work contexts and resistance to organisational change: The role of leader-member exchange, development climate, and change process characteristics. Applied Psychology, 57(2), 313-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00311.x

Wahid, M., & Ayub, N. (2024). Predictive role of psychological capital and perceived organizational support on innovative work behavior among higher education teachers of Pakistan. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 11(2), 191-219. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.2715

Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257

Zhu, Y., & Tsai, K.-C. (2024). A study on the impact of perceived leadership member exchange on innovation behavior by university lecturers. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.3044

Zhu, Y., Tsai, C.-Y., Wang, Y., & Guo, Z. (2023). Does leader-follower PsyCap congruence cultivate change-related outcomes? A supervisor-subordinate fit perspective. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 30(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518221132037

Downloads

Published

2026-06-28

How to Cite

Utama, D. D., Zulfakhri, Z., Nikensari, I., Sariwulan, T., & Yohana, C. (2026). From Work-Life Conflict to Innovative Behaviour: The Mediating Roles of Psychological Capital, Leader-Member Exchange, and Resistance to Change. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Dan Bisnis, 4(2), 649-673. https://doi.org/10.70716/emis.v4i2.610