Kebijakan Kerja Hybrid, Job Autonomy, dan Pos terhadap Turnover Intention melalui Employee Engagement pada PT Quinsis Lintas Mitra

Syaeful Yusuf Surawijaya; Rian Sri Rahayu; Kasmad Kasmad

doi:10.70716/perseptif.v4i3.812

Authors

Syaeful Yusuf Surawijaya Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Universitas Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia Author
Rian Sri Rahayu Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Universitas Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia Author
Kasmad Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Universitas Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70716/perseptif.v4i3.812

Keywords:

Hybrid Work Policy, Job Autonomy, Perceived Organizational Support, Employee Engagement, Turnover Intention

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of Hybrid Work Policy, Job Autonomy, and Perceived Organizational Support on Turnover Intention through Employee Engagement as an intervening variable among employees of PT Quinsis Lintas Mitra, an IT Services company in Indonesia whose turnover rate escalated from 14% (2022) to 23% (2025). This study used a quantitative approach with an explanatory, cross-sectional design. The sample comprised the entire population of 150 employees determined through saturated sampling. Data were collected using a 1–5 Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) with SmartPLS 4. The outer model evaluation showed that all indicators were valid (outer loading > 0.70) and reliable (Cronbach's Alpha and Composite Reliability > 0.90). Hypothesis testing revealed that Job Autonomy and Perceived Organizational Support significantly affect Employee Engagement, whereas Hybrid Work Policy does not. Regarding Turnover Intention, Job Autonomy has a significant positive effect, Perceived Organizational Support has a significant negative effect, while Hybrid Work Policy and Employee Engagement show no significant effect. Employee Engagement was also found unable to mediate the relationship between the three independent variables and Turnover Intention. These findings suggest that employee retention strategies in IT Services firms should focus on strengthening Perceived Organizational Support and managing Job Autonomy alongside transparent career paths and competitive compensation.

References

Ahmed, I., & Nawaz, M. M. (2015). Antecedents and outcomes of perceived organizational support: A literature survey approach. Journal of Management Development, 34(7), 867–880. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-09-2013-0115

Akgunduz, Y., & Sanli, S. C. (2017). The effect of employee advocacy and perceived organizational support on job embeddedness and turnover intention in hotels. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 31, 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2016.12.002

Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273

Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. (2018). Work engagement: Current trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2017-0207

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056

Caesens, G., Stinglhamber, F., Demoulin, S., & De Wilde, M. (2019). Perceived organizational support and employees’ well-being: The role of work–self balance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1544982

Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. (2021). Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 655–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3251

Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x

Cohen, G., Blake, R. S., & Goodman, D. (2016). Does turnover intention matter? Evaluating the usefulness of turnover intention rate as a predictor of actual turnover rate. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(3), 240–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X15581850

Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099

Deloitte. (2023). 2023 Gen Z and Millennial survey: Asia Pacific report. Deloitte Insights.

Gartner. (2022). Global technology workforce turnover trends report. Gartner Research.

Gašić, D., & Berber, N. (2023). The mediating role of employee engagement in the relationship between flexible work arrangements and turnover intentions among highly educated employees in the Republic of Serbia. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020131

Hair, J. F., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.

Hom, P. W., Lee, T. W., Shaw, J. D., & Hausknecht, J. P. (2017). One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 530–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000103

Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332–1356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332

Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., Choi, V. K., Creary, S. J., Demerouti, E., Flynn, F. J., Gelfand, M. J., Greer, L. L., Johns, G., Kesebir, S., Klein, P. G., Lee, S. Y., Ozcelik, H., Petriglieri, J. L., Rothbard, N. P., Rudolph, C. W., Shaw, J. D., Sirola, N., Wanberg, C. R., Whillans, A., Wilmot, M. P., & Van Vugt, M. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716

Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554

Lesener, T., Gusy, B., & Wolter, C. (2019). The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Work & Stress, 33(1), 76–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2018.1529065

Mäkikangas, A., Juutinen, S., Mäkiniemi, J.-P., Sjöblom, K., & Oksanen, A. (2022). Work engagement and its antecedents in remote work: A person-centered view. Work & Stress, 36(4), 392–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2022.2080777

Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 237–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.2.237

Parker, S. K., Morgeson, F. P., & Johns, G. (2017). One hundred years of work design research: Looking back and looking forward. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000106

Raišienė, A. G., Rapuano, V., & Varkulevičiūtė, K. (2021). Sensitive points in remote work: A resources perspective. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030176

Saks, A. M. (2022). Caring human resource management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 32(3), 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100835

Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Engaging leadership: How to promote work engagement? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 754556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754556

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.

TopDev Indonesia. (2023). Laporan tren talenta digital dan turnover industri IT Indonesia 2023. TopDev.

Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290