Formulasi Constitutional Ethics sebagai Instrumen Pengawasan Imparsialitas Eksekutif dalam Tahapan Pemilu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70716/perseptif.v4i3.562Keywords:
Constitutional Ethics, Executive Impartiality, Election, Legal ReformAbstract
This study examines the urgency of formulating constitutional ethics as a legal instrument to oversee the impartiality of the executive branch during the electoral process in Indonesia. Executive dominance has the potential to lead to abuse of power, the politicization of the bureaucracy, and the use of state resources for electoral purposes, while election regulations still focus on administrative and criminal violations. This study employs a normative legal methodology using legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that constitutional ethics plays a strategic role as a bridge between legality and morality in state governance. The formalization of constitutional ethics is necessary to establish standards of conduct for public officials, strengthen ethical accountability, and safeguard executive neutrality and democratic integrity in the conduct of elections.
References
Ahmad, S. (2022). Netralitas aparatur sipil negara dalam pemilu demokratis. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(2), 288–301.
Bupati, A., & Utama, I. W. (2024). Executive neutrality and the preservation of electoral integrity in presidential systems. Journal of Democratic Governance, 12(2), 115–130.
Fadjar, A. M. (2020). Etika konstitusi dalam demokrasi modern. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(2), 201–219.
Fauzan, A. (2022). Etika konstitusi dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 11(1), 27–40.
Gaffar, J. M. (2021). Netralitas kekuasaan eksekutif dalam pemilu demokratis. Jurnal Bawaslu, 3(1), 41–55.
Huda, N. (2020). Demokrasi konstitusional dan pengawasan kekuasaan eksekutif. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 27(3), 412–428.
Huda, N. (2020). Hukum tata negara Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.
Irwan, M. (2026). Restorative justice in the Indonesian criminal justice system: Philosophical foundations and implementation challenges. PERSEPTIF: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 3(1), 45–60.
Isra, S. (2021). Penyalahgunaan kekuasaan dalam demokrasi elektoral. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(4), 515–530.
Khaitan, T. (2018). Constitutional morality: An Indian model of constitutionalism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(2), 420–441.
Mahfud MD. (2022). Etika kekuasaan dan demokrasi konstitusional. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 29(1), 15–29.
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian hukum. Kencana.
Moller, J., & Skaaning, S. E. (2021). Electoral integrity and democratic governance: A conceptual framework. Democratization, 28(4), 711–728.
Norris, P. (2019). Securing electoral integrity: Choice, challenge, and change. Cambridge University Press.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum progresif: Sebuah sintesa hukum Indonesia. Genta Publishing.
Saragih, B. R. (2022). Constitutional morality dalam praktik ketatanegaraan. Jurnal Yudisial, 15(1), 33–47.
Sutiyoso, B. (2021). Etika politik dan negara hukum demokratis. Jurnal Media Hukum, 28(2), 144–159.
Thompson, D. F. (2018). Political ethics and public office: The problem of executive overreach. Harvard Law Review, 131(6), 1621–1643.
Widagdo, Y. (2022). Constitutional ethics dan budaya demokrasi. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(3), 291–307.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhamad Irwan, Rizky Perdana Bayu Putra (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
