Efektivitas Sistem Informasi Desa terhadap Akurasi Data Kependudukan: Studi Kuantitatif di Kecamatan Pringgarata, Kabupaten Lombok Tengah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70716/perseptif.v3i3.444Keywords:
village information system, population data accuracy, village governance, quantitative studyAbstract
This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the Village Information System on the accuracy of population data in Pringgarata District, Central Lombok Regency. Accurate population data are essential for development planning and public service delivery at the village level. This research employs a quantitative approach with an explanatory design. Data were collected through structured questionnaires distributed to village officials directly involved in population data management. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics and simple linear regression. The results indicate that the effectiveness of the Village Information System has a positive and significant effect on population data accuracy. A system that is easy to use, reliable, and efficient in data processing reduces input errors and improves data consistency and timeliness. These findings confirm the importance of village-level digital systems in enhancing the quality of population data. Nevertheless, maximizing system benefits requires adequate human resource capacity and effective village administrative governance.
References
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2016). Information systems success measurement. Foundations and Trends in Information Systems, 2(1), 1–116. https://doi.org/10.1561/2900000005
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fischer, F., Miller, G. J., & Sidney, M. S. (2015). Handbook of public policy analysis. CRC Press.
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327188
Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2020). Basic econometrics (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2017). Research ethics for social scientists (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Kahn, B. K., Strong, D. M., & Wang, R. Y. (2017). A framework for delivering high quality data. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34(2), 422–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2017.1334465
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101385
Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. R. (2018). Measuring information systems success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(2), 7–62. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290201
Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Williams, M. D., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Adoption of online public services. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(3), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-015-9613-9
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2017). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). Wiley.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2016). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 40(1), 157–178.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lalu Ahmad Zainuddin, Baiq Nurul Hidayati (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
